Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nima A. Rowshan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 23:50, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nima A. Rowshan[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:N Ladsgroup^overleg 20:56, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Music, and Iran. Ladsgroup^overleg 20:56, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 22:42, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - satisfies GNG. Bhivuti45 (talk) 11:04, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't find any reliable source about him. There is only mention of name in tagesshau Ladsgroup^overleg 17:04, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please check the references 7,8 & 16. The Donaueschinger Musiktage is not a Tagesschau. It's recognized as one of the most prestigious contemporary classical music festivals. Sofreakso (talk) 10:13, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Herald (Benison) (talk) 22:12, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom lacks indepth coverage fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 21:31, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The criteria of GNG is different for contemporary classical composers. The name has been mentioned in academic essays. A commission by Donaueschinger Musiktage also make it meets GNG. There are lots of newspaper coverage regarding "Alamut" and also lots of newspaper coverage in other languages, but the name spelling seems different in some of them. Sofreakso (talk) 10:05, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 22:54, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per fairly strong consensus with respect to WP:NMUSIC. It does not matter what the genre is; in fact, many new genres have been deleted since 2007. In order to argue for exceptions, you have to show examples. I've done thousands of AfDs, including hundreds of musical ones, and I'm unaware of any genre-based exception. If the consensus has changed, then we need dozens of folks to chime in. Bearian (talk) 14:24, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.